There are a handful of TV shows that I think almost everyone could like, if they gave them half a chance. “Kings” isn’t one of them. I could never be angry with someone for disliking “Kings,” because it is…bizarre. NBC’s last big action/drama success, “Heroes,” at least had the kind of premise that really holds its own. When you try to explain “Kings,” you always find yourself wanting to apologize.

But “Kings” works precisely because it is so strange. “Bizarre and bold” are some of the words critics have used to describe it. Since it takes place in the fictional world of Gilboa, it can be both realistic and completely unbelievable. We aren’t expected to think that this is our world - just that it tells us a story about it.

“Kings” is a Biblical story, familiar to those of us who went to Sunday school. For those who didn’t, you can get all your spoilers here - presumably, this retelling of the story will adhere somewhat faithfully to the original. However, given that critics agree Ian McShane (the King Saul character) is the best part of the show, it’s possible he will outlive his Biblical counterpart.

How the show will handle the relationship between David and Jack (Jonathan) will almost definitely determine how Christians and gay rights groups respond to “Kings:” if they ignore the homoerotic subtext of the incredibly close relationship between David and Jack, gay rights groups will cry foul. If they play it up, many Christians will be upset. They will have to treat very carefully.

It’s impossible to predict where the show will go, exactly, but what I do know is that I like it so far. I like King Silas, which doesn’t surprise me, because I like Ian McShane. Hopefully, the same magnetism that attracted “Deadwood’s” fans will draw them to “Kings.” I want to see this one given a decent chance.

Popularity: 4% [?]